Raw Deal is a 1986 action film directed by John Irvin and starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. The movie follows the story of Mark Kaminsky, an ex-FBI agent who is forced to go undercover in the criminal underworld to take down a powerful mob boss. However, the ending of Raw Deal leaves many viewers puzzled and wanting more clarification. In this article, we will attempt to explain the ending of Raw Deal and shed light on its ambiguous conclusion.
Throughout the film, Mark Kaminsky, played by Schwarzenegger, infiltrates the criminal organization led by Luigi Patrovita (Sam Wanamaker). Kaminsky’s ultimate goal is to bring down Patrovita and dismantle his empire. As the story progresses, Kaminsky faces numerous obstacles and challenges, including betrayal from within his own team.
In the climactic final act of Raw Deal, Kaminsky manages to successfully expose Patrovita’s criminal activities to the authorities. However, just as it seems like justice will prevail, an unexpected twist occurs. It is revealed that Kaminsky’s superior at the FBI, Harry Shannon (Darren McGavin), has been working with Patrovita all along.
This revelation turns everything upside down for Kaminsky and the audience. It raises questions about trust and loyalty within law enforcement agencies. Kaminsky finds himself in a precarious situation where he must confront both Shannon and Patrovita to ensure his survival.
In a tense showdown, Kaminsky confronts Shannon and exposes his treachery. He then proceeds to take down Patrovita’s organization single-handedly. The final scenes of Raw Deal showcase intense action sequences as Kaminsky fights off henchmen and ultimately eliminates Patrovita himself.
The movie ends with Kaminsky surviving the ordeal but facing an uncertain future. He has successfully completed his mission but at great personal cost. The ending leaves viewers wondering what lies ahead for Kaminsky after such a traumatic experience.
One interpretation of the ending is that Kaminsky’s journey has fundamentally changed him. He started as a disillusioned ex-FBI agent seeking redemption, but his encounter with corruption and betrayal has left him even more jaded. The ambiguous ending suggests that Kaminsky’s fight against organized crime may never truly be over.
Another possible explanation is that the ending serves as a commentary on the nature of justice. Despite Kaminsky’s efforts, he still finds himself in a morally gray area. The revelation of Shannon’s betrayal highlights the pervasive corruption within institutions meant to uphold the law. This ending leaves viewers questioning whether true justice can ever be achieved in a world tainted by such deep-rooted corruption.
In conclusion, Raw Deal’s ending is deliberately ambiguous and open to interpretation. It raises thought-provoking questions about trust, loyalty, and the nature of justice. Whether you view it as a character study or a commentary on societal corruption, one thing is clear: Raw Deal leaves a lasting impact on its audience long after the credits roll.
