Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut Ending Explained
Superman II, the 1980 superhero film directed by Richard Lester, is considered a classic in the genre. However, due to various production issues, the original director Richard Donner was replaced midway through filming. This led to significant changes in the movie’s tone and storyline. Decades later, in 2006, Warner Bros. released Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut, which aimed to restore Donner’s original vision for the film. One of the most notable changes in this version is its ending.
In order to understand the significance of the Richard Donner Cut ending, it is essential to delve into the differences between Donner’s version and Lester’s theatrical release. While both versions follow a similar plotline, they diverge when it comes to character development and overall tone. Donner’s cut focuses more on Superman’s emotional journey and explores his relationship with Lois Lane in greater depth.
The ending of Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut differs significantly from Lester’s theatrical release. In Lester’s version, Superman uses his memory-erasing kiss on Lois Lane to make her forget his secret identity and their romantic involvement. This choice has been criticized for being out of character for Superman and undermining Lois’ agency.
On the other hand, in Donner’s cut, Superman does not erase Lois’ memory but instead reverses time using his powers. This decision aligns more closely with Superman’s established abilities and moral code. By reversing time, he undoes all the damage caused by General Zod and his cohorts while also preventing any memory loss or manipulation.
Donner’s ending not only stays true to Superman’s character but also provides a more satisfying conclusion to the film. It allows for growth in Superman as he learns from his mistakes and finds a way to save both Metropolis and his relationship with Lois without resorting to questionable actions.
The Richard Donner Cut ending also sets up the possibility of a third film that would have continued Donner’s vision. Unfortunately, due to various reasons, including financial constraints and creative differences, Superman III was ultimately made with a different director and veered away from Donner’s intended storyline.
While Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut may not be considered canon in the Superman film series, it remains a fascinating glimpse into what could have been. It showcases Richard Donner’s original vision for the film and provides fans with an alternative ending that is more faithful to the character of Superman.
In conclusion, the ending of Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut offers a more satisfying resolution to the story than its theatrical counterpart. By staying true to Superman’s character and abilities, it provides closure to both the action-packed plotline and the emotional arc between Superman and Lois Lane. Whether or not one considers it canon, this alternate version of the film allows fans to appreciate Richard Donner’s original vision for the iconic superhero.
