Hot Bench is a popular courtroom show that features a panel of three judges who preside over small claims cases. The show has gained a significant following since its debut in 2014, with viewers tuning in to see the judges’ unique approach to resolving disputes. However, in recent years, there have been some changes to the lineup of judges on Hot Bench. In this article, we will explore what happened to the judges on Hot Bench and how these changes have impacted the show.
Hot Bench initially featured three judges: Judge Judy Sheindlin, Judge Patricia DiMango, and Judge Tanya Acker. Judge Judy, who is known for her no-nonsense approach and sharp wit, served as the presiding judge on the show. Judge DiMango and Judge Acker, both experienced jurists in their own right, provided additional perspectives and insights during the cases.
However, in 2020, Judge Judy announced that she would be stepping down from her role on Hot Bench. This decision came as a surprise to many fans of the show, as Judge Judy had been a fixture on daytime television for over two decades. She explained that she wanted to focus on other projects and spend more time with her family. Despite her departure, Judge Judy assured viewers that Hot Bench would continue with a new lineup of judges.
Following Judge Judy’s departure, the producers of Hot Bench introduced two new judges to the panel: Judge Michael Corriero and Judge Sarah L. Tressler. Judge Corriero, a former New York State Supreme Court judge, brought a wealth of experience to the show. His expertise in criminal law and his compassionate approach to justice quickly endeared him to viewers. Judge Tressler, a former journalist and attorney, added a fresh perspective to the panel with her sharp analytical skills and quick thinking.
The addition of Judge Corriero and Judge Tressler brought a new dynamic to Hot Bench. The show continued to feature the same format, with the judges hearing cases and rendering decisions. However, the new judges brought their own unique styles to the courtroom. Judge Corriero’s calm and measured demeanor provided a sense of stability, while Judge Tressler’s assertiveness and attention to detail added a level of intensity to the proceedings.
Despite the changes, Hot Bench has remained a popular show among viewers. The cases presented on the show continue to be diverse and interesting, ranging from landlord-tenant disputes to contract disagreements. The judges’ ability to cut through the noise and get to the heart of the matter has been a key factor in the show’s success. Additionally, the show’s format, which allows for three judges to deliberate and debate the merits of each case, provides a unique perspective that sets it apart from other courtroom shows.
While the departure of Judge Judy was undoubtedly a loss for Hot Bench, the addition of Judge Corriero and Judge Tressler has breathed new life into the show. The chemistry between the judges is evident, and their differing viewpoints often lead to lively discussions and debates. This dynamic keeps viewers engaged and invested in the outcome of each case.
In conclusion, the judges on Hot Bench have undergone some changes in recent years. Judge Judy’s departure was a significant loss for the show, but the addition of Judge Corriero and Judge Tressler has helped to fill the void. The new lineup of judges has brought fresh perspectives and unique styles to the courtroom, keeping viewers entertained and engaged. Hot Bench continues to be a popular courtroom show, thanks in large part to the talented and dynamic judges who preside over the cases.
