Miller’s Crossing Ending Explained

Miller’s Crossing Ending Explained

Miller’s Crossing is a 1990 crime film directed by Joel and Ethan Coen. Known for their unique storytelling style, the...

Miller’s Crossing is a 1990 crime film directed by Joel and Ethan Coen. Known for their unique storytelling style, the...

Table of Contents

Miller’s Crossing is a 1990 crime film directed by Joel and Ethan Coen. Known for their unique storytelling style, the Coen brothers often leave audiences with ambiguous endings that require interpretation. Miller’s Crossing is no exception.

The film follows Tom Reagan, played by Gabriel Byrne, a trusted advisor to Irish mob boss Leo O’Bannon, portrayed by Albert Finney. Set in the Prohibition era, Miller’s Crossing is a tale of loyalty, betrayal, and power struggles within the criminal underworld.

The ending of Miller’s Crossing has puzzled viewers since its release. In the final scenes, Tom finds himself in a forest clearing after being double-crossed by Leo’s girlfriend Verna (played by Marcia Gay Harden). He is confronted by two hitmen who have been sent to kill him. However, instead of shooting Tom, they spare his life due to an intervention from Bernie Bernbaum (played by John Turturro), a character whom Tom had previously ordered to be killed.

This unexpected turn of events raises several questions. Why did the hitmen spare Tom? What was Bernie’s motive for intervening? And what does this all mean for the characters involved?

One interpretation of the ending suggests that Tom’s survival is due to his reputation as a cunning and resourceful individual. Throughout the film, he demonstrates his ability to outsmart his enemies and manipulate situations to his advantage. The hitmen may have recognized this and decided that it would be more beneficial to keep Tom alive as an ally rather than eliminate him.

Another theory revolves around Bernie’s intervention. Despite being betrayed by Tom earlier in the film, Bernie saves him from certain death. This act could be seen as an act of redemption or forgiveness on Bernie’s part. It also adds another layer to the complex relationships between the characters.

RELATED:  Game of Thrones: The Last Watch Ending Explained

Furthermore, some argue that the ending serves as a commentary on fate and chance. The forest clearing where Tom finds himself can be seen as a metaphorical crossroads, where his destiny is determined. The fact that he is spared by the hitmen and saved by Bernie could be interpreted as a stroke of luck or a twist of fate.

Ultimately, the Coen brothers intentionally leave the ending open to interpretation. They invite viewers to draw their own conclusions and engage in discussions about the film’s themes and messages. Miller’s Crossing is a film that rewards multiple viewings, as each viewing can reveal new layers of meaning and understanding.

In conclusion, the ending of Miller’s Crossing remains enigmatic and subject to interpretation. Whether it is a testament to Tom’s cunning, Bernie’s redemption, or simply a twist of fate, one thing is certain – it leaves audiences captivated and eager to unravel its mysteries.

RELATED TOPICS:

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related articles you'll love: