The Death of Stalin is a dark comedy film directed by Armando Iannucci, which depicts the power struggle and chaos that ensues following the death of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin in 1953. The film is based on real events but takes a satirical approach to portray the absurdity and brutality of the Soviet regime. In this article, we will delve into the ending of The Death of Stalin, analyzing its significance and exploring the themes it presents.
The film concludes with the funeral of Joseph Stalin, where the main characters, who are members of the Soviet Politburo, gather to pay their respects and potentially seize power. The funeral scene serves as a culmination of the power struggle that has been brewing throughout the film, as each character vies for control over the Soviet Union.
As the funeral progresses, the tension among the characters reaches its peak. Nikita Khrushchev, played by Steve Buscemi, emerges as the central figure in the power struggle. Khrushchev, who initially appears to be a bumbling and indecisive character, gradually reveals his cunning and ambition. He skillfully manipulates the situation to his advantage, outmaneuvering his rivals and positioning himself as the frontrunner for leadership.
One of Khrushchev’s main rivals is Lavrentiy Beria, played by Simon Russell Beale, the head of the secret police. Beria is depicted as a ruthless and sadistic character, responsible for countless atrocities under Stalin’s regime. As the film progresses, it becomes clear that Beria’s power is waning, and he becomes increasingly desperate to maintain control.
In a pivotal moment during the funeral, Khrushchev confronts Beria about his crimes and orchestrates his arrest. This scene is significant as it represents the downfall of Beria and the triumph of Khrushchev. It also highlights the theme of justice and accountability, as Beria is finally held responsible for his actions.
Following Beria’s arrest, Khrushchev consolidates his power by gaining the support of the other members of the Politburo. The film portrays this process as a series of backroom deals, betrayals, and alliances, showcasing the corrupt nature of the Soviet regime. Khrushchev’s rise to power is not portrayed as a noble or heroic act, but rather as a result of cunning and opportunism.
As the film concludes, Khrushchev emerges as the new leader of the Soviet Union. However, the tone remains somber, as the characters are acutely aware of the precariousness of their positions. The film ends with a shot of Khrushchev looking out of a window, contemplating the immense responsibility that comes with his newfound power.
The ending of The Death of Stalin raises several important themes and questions. One of the central themes is the absurdity and brutality of totalitarian regimes. The film portrays the Soviet Union under Stalin as a place where fear and paranoia reign, and where loyalty to the regime is valued above all else. The power struggle that ensues following Stalin’s death highlights the inherent instability and chaos of such a system.
Another theme explored in the film is the nature of power and its corrupting influence. The characters in The Death of Stalin are driven by their desire for power and are willing to betray and manipulate each other to achieve their goals. The film suggests that power corrupts individuals and exposes their true nature, as seen in the ruthless actions of characters like Beria.
Furthermore, the film raises questions about the role of ideology in totalitarian regimes. The characters in The Death of Stalin claim to be loyal followers of the Communist Party, but their actions reveal a disregard for the principles they supposedly uphold. The film suggests that ideology is often used as a tool to justify and maintain power, rather than as a genuine belief system.
In conclusion, The Death of Stalin is a dark comedy film that explores the power struggle and chaos that ensues following the death of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. The ending of the film sees Nikita Khrushchev emerging as the new leader of the Soviet Union, after outmaneuvering his rivals and orchestrating the downfall of Lavrentiy Beria. The film raises important themes about the nature of power, the absurdity of totalitarian regimes, and the role of ideology. The ending leaves the audience with a sense of unease, as the characters are acutely aware of the fragility and uncertainty of their positions.
